Example 1: The loss that meant nothing
Two traders take the identical, well-executed setup and both lose. The first treats the loss as a verdict, feels he was wrong, and spirals into changing his method. The second shrugs: this was one of the losers any edge inevitably includes, the execution was correct, and over a large enough sample the distribution should do its work. A month later the second trader, having kept executing, is ahead, while the first abandoned a working edge over a single, near-meaningless sample. The trade was the same; only the framing differed, and the framing drove the behaviour that led to the different result.
